|
UN Security Council
Resolution 1495 |
|
|---|---|
| Date: | 31 July 2003 |
| Meeting no.: | 4,801 |
| Code: | S/RES/1495 (Document) |
|
|
|
| Vote: | For: 15 Abs.: 0 Against: 0 |
| Subject: | The situation concerning Western Sahara |
| Result: | Adopted |
|
|
|
| Security Council composition in 2003: | |
| permanent members: | |
| non-permanent members: | |
| ANG BUL CHI CMR ESP | |
| GER GUI MEX PAK SYR | |
|
|
|
| Boujdour in Western Sahara | |
| Part of a series on the |
| History of Western Sahara |
|---|
| Background |
| History of Morocco (Colonial wars) Spanish Sahara · Spanish Morocco Moroccan Army of Liberation Harakat Tahrir · Sahrawi National Union Party Madrid Accords |
| Disputed regions |
| Saguia el-Hamra · Río de Oro Southern Provinces · Free Zone · |
| Politics |
| Legal status of Western Sahara · Politics of Morocco / of the SADR Polisario Front (former members) Royal Advisory Council for Saharan Affairs |
| Rebellions |
|
Pre-1975: post 1975: Western Sahara conflict (Western Sahara War · Independence Intifada) |
| Conflict issues |
| Refugee camps · Wall · Human rights in Western Sahara |
| Sahara peace process |
| Resolution 1495 · Resolution 1754 · Visiting mission · Referendum mission · ICJ Advisory Opinion · Settlement Plan · Houston Agreement · Baker Plan · Manhasset negotiations · Moroccan Initiative |
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1495, adopted unanimously on July 31, 2003, after recalling all previous resolutions on the situation in Western Sahara, particularly Resolution 1429 (2002), the Council extended the mandate of the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) until October 31, 2003 and supported the Baker Plan put forth by James Baker III, who was at that time the Special Representative for Western Sahara of the Secretary-General Kofi Annan, as a replacement of the 1991 Settlement Plan.[1] The resolution, adopted after significant changes to the original draft,[2] was welcomed by the Polisario Front, which supported the Baker Plan, but not by Morocco, which resisted it.[3]
Contents |
The Security Council was concerned at the lack of progress towards a political solution to the dispute between Morroco and the Polisario Front, which remained a potential source of instability to the Maghreb region.[4] It reaffirmed its commitment to assist the parties in achieving a durable solution which will provide for the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara. The parties were commended for their respect of the ceasefire and MINURSO's efforts were also praised.
Acting under Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter, the Council supported the Baker Plan as the "optimum political solution" to the dispute and called upon both parties to work towards the acceptance and implementation of the plan.[5] Furthermore, the parties and states in the region were asked to co-operate with the Secretary-General and his Personal Envoy.[4]
The resolution called upon the Polisario Front to release all remaining prisoners of war under international humanitarian law and for both parties to co-operate with the International Committee of the Red Cross to resolve the issue of persons unaccounted for since the start of the conflict.[4] The parties were urged to implement confidence-building measures with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and for the international community to support the UNHCR and World Food Programme in overcoming the deteriorating food situation among refugees.
Finally, the Secretary-General was asked to provide an assessment of the situation before October 31, 2003.
|
|||||